Fix GuideInjection
How to Fix CWE-78: OS Command Injection
Verified by Precogs Threat Research
The application passes untrusted input to system shell commands without proper sanitization.
⚠️ Impact if Unpatched
Full server compromise, arbitrary OS command execution, data exfiltration, pivot point for network attacks.
Step-by-Step Remediation
- Use language-native APIs instead of shell commands (e.g., fs.rename instead of mv)
- If shell commands are unavoidable, use parameterized execution (subprocess with list args)
- Never pass user input directly to shell interpreters
- Implement strict input validation with allowlists
- Run applications with minimal OS privileges
Code Example
❌ Vulnerable
# VULNERABLE: Shell injection
os.system(f"ping {user_input}")✅ Fixed
# SAFE: Parameterized subprocess
subprocess.run(["ping", "-c", "1", user_input], shell=False)Don't just patch one instance.
Scan your entire codebase for all instances of OS Command Injection.
Scan for Free with Precogs AI →Recent Vulnerabilities (CWE-78)
46 vulnerabilities in our database match OS Command Injection.
C
CVE-2026-22708: Cursor AI Code Editor RCE via Shell Built-ins — Auto-Run protection bypass
C
CVE-2024-48889: OS Command Injection in FortiManager
C
CVE-2024-48891: OS Command Injection in FortiSOAR
C
CVE-2025-20393: Cisco AsyncOS — Maximum severity zero-day with CVSS 10.0
H
CVE-2026-32056: OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.
H
CVE-2026-4499: A vulnerability was determined in D-Link DIR-820LW 2.
H
CVE-2026-4497: A vulnerability was determined in Totolink WA300 5.
M
CVE-2026-4496: A vulnerability was found in sigmade Git-MCP-Server up to 785aa159f262a02d5791a5
U
CVE-2026-22902: A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QuNetSwitch.
U