CVE-2020-28493

Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in Jinja2

Verified by Precogs Threat Research
Last Updated: Feb 14, 2025
Base Score
9.8CRITICAL

Executive Summary

CVE-2020-28493 is a critical severity vulnerability affecting binary-analysis. It is classified as an undisclosed flaw. Ensure your systems and dependencies are patched immediately to mitigate exposure risks.

Precogs AI Insight

"At its core, this issue originates from within The package jinja2, allowing the mishandling of memory allocation boundaries. When targeted, an adversary might use this to execute arbitrary code on the target system, potentially leading to full system compromise. The Precogs binary analysis module maps structural execution flows to prevent unauthorized logical exploitation."

Exploit Probability (EPSS)
Low (0.2%)
Public POC
Available
Exploit Probability
High (84%)
Public POC
Available
Affected Assets
binary analysisNVD Database

What is this vulnerability?

CVE-2020-28493 is categorized as a critical Memory Corruption Vulnerability flaw. Based on our vulnerability intelligence, this issue occurs when the application fails to securely handle untrusted data boundaries.

This affects the package jinja2 from 0.0.0 and before 2.11.3. The ReDOS vulnerability of the regex is mainly due to the sub-pattern [a-zA-Z0-9._-]+.[a-zA-Z.

This architectural defect enables adversaries to bypass intended security controls, directly manipulating the application's execution state or data layer. Immediate strategic intervention is required.

Risk Assessment

MetricValue
CVSS Base Score9.8 (CRITICAL)
Vector StringN/A
PublishedMarch 19, 2021
Last ModifiedFebruary 14, 2025
Related CWEsN/A

Impact on Systems

Remote Code Execution: Adversaries may execute arbitrary code by overwriting memory regions.

Denial of Service: Memory corruption often leads to unrecoverable application crashes.

Information Disclosure: Out-of-bounds reads can expose adjacent memory containing sensitive data.

How to fix this issue?

Implement the following strategic mitigations immediately to eliminate the attack surface.

1. Memory-Safe Languages When possible, migrate parsing logic to memory-safe languages like Rust or Go.

2. Compiler Protections Ensure the binary is compiled with ASLR, DEP/NX, Stack Canaries, and RELRO.

3. Fuzz Testing Implement continuous fuzzing with AddressSanitizer (ASan) in the CI/CD pipeline.

Vulnerability Signature

// Generic Memory Corruption Vector (C/C++)
void process_input(char *user_data, size_t size) \{
    char buffer[256];
    // DANGEROUS: Unbounded memory operation
    memcpy(buffer, user_data, size); // size may exceed 256
    
    // SECURED: Bound-checked operation
    if (size \> sizeof(buffer)) \{
        size = sizeof(buffer);
    \}
    memcpy(buffer, user_data, size);
\}

References and Sources

Vulnerability Code Signature

Attack Data Flow

StageDetail
SourceNetwork packet or file input
VectorData exceeds the allocated buffer bounds during a copy operation
Sinkstrcpy(), memcpy(), or pointer arithmetic
ImpactMemory corruption, Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Vulnerable Code Pattern

// ❌ VULNERABLE: Memory Corruption
void process_data(char *input) {
    char buffer[128];
    // Taint sink: copies without bounds checking
    strcpy(buffer, input);
}

Secure Code Pattern

// ✅ SECURE: Bounded Memory Operations
void process_data(char *input) {
    char buffer[128];
    // Sanitized boundary check
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
}

How Precogs Detects This

Precogs Binary SAST engine explicitly uncovers memory boundary violations and unsafe memory management functions in compiled binaries.\n

Is your system affected?

Precogs AI detects CVE-2020-28493 in compiled binaries, LLMs, and application layers — even without source code access.