CVE-2025-25277

in OpenHarmony v5.

Verified by Precogs Threat Research
Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026
Base Score
6.3MEDIUM

Executive Summary

CVE-2025-25277 is a medium severity vulnerability affecting binary-analysis. It is classified as CWE-843. Ensure your systems and dependencies are patched immediately to mitigate exposure risks.

Precogs AI Insight

"At its core, this issue originates from within OpenHarmony v5.1.0, allowing the mishandling of memory allocation boundaries. Exploitation typically involves an attacker attempting to compromise the entire application stack, rendering traditional defenses ineffective. Precogs identifies insecure dynamic linking patterns without requiring source code access to intercept unsafe execution patterns."

Exploit Probability (EPSS)
Low (0.0%)
Public POC
Undisclosed
Exploit Probability
Low (<10%)
Public POC
Available
Affected Assets
binary analysisCWE-843

What is this vulnerability?

CVE-2025-25277 is categorized as a critical Memory Corruption Vulnerability flaw. Based on our vulnerability intelligence, this issue occurs when the application fails to securely handle untrusted data boundaries.

in OpenHarmony v5.1.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker arbitrary code execution in pre-installed apps through using incompatible type. This vulner...

This architectural defect enables adversaries to bypass intended security controls, directly manipulating the application's execution state or data layer. Immediate strategic intervention is required.

Risk Assessment

MetricValue
CVSS Base Score6.3 (MEDIUM)
Vector StringCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
PublishedMarch 16, 2026
Last ModifiedMarch 17, 2026
Related CWEsCWE-843

Impact on Systems

Remote Code Execution: Adversaries may execute arbitrary code by overwriting memory regions.

Denial of Service: Memory corruption often leads to unrecoverable application crashes.

Information Disclosure: Out-of-bounds reads can expose adjacent memory containing sensitive data.

How to fix this issue?

Implement the following strategic mitigations immediately to eliminate the attack surface.

1. Memory-Safe Languages When possible, migrate parsing logic to memory-safe languages like Rust or Go.

2. Compiler Protections Ensure the binary is compiled with ASLR, DEP/NX, Stack Canaries, and RELRO.

3. Fuzz Testing Implement continuous fuzzing with AddressSanitizer (ASan) in the CI/CD pipeline.

Vulnerability Signature

// Generic Memory Corruption Vector (C/C++)
void process_input(char *user_data, size_t size) \{
    char buffer[256];
    // DANGEROUS: Unbounded memory operation
    memcpy(buffer, user_data, size); // size may exceed 256
    
    // SECURED: Bound-checked operation
    if (size \> sizeof(buffer)) \{
        size = sizeof(buffer);
    \}
    memcpy(buffer, user_data, size);
\}

References and Sources

Vulnerability Code Signature

Attack Data Flow

StageDetail
SourceNetwork packet or file input
VectorData exceeds the allocated buffer bounds during a copy operation
Sinkstrcpy(), memcpy(), or pointer arithmetic
ImpactMemory corruption, Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Vulnerable Code Pattern

// ❌ VULNERABLE: Memory Corruption
void process_data(char *input) {
    char buffer[128];
    // Taint sink: copies without bounds checking
    strcpy(buffer, input);
}

Secure Code Pattern

// ✅ SECURE: Bounded Memory Operations
void process_data(char *input) {
    char buffer[128];
    // Sanitized boundary check
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
}

How Precogs Detects This

Precogs Binary SAST engine explicitly uncovers memory boundary violations and unsafe memory management functions in compiled binaries.\n

Related Vulnerabilitiesvia CWE-843

Is your system affected?

Precogs AI detects CVE-2025-25277 in compiled binaries, LLMs, and application layers — even without source code access.